Bug 232702

Summary: Review Request: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 - Low-Level Interface to bzip2 compression library
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Steven Pritchard <steve>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Andreas Thienemann <andreas>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: robin.norwood
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-06-27 17:25:39 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449, 232703    

Description Steven Pritchard 2007-03-16 14:18:34 EDT
Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec
SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.004-1.src.rpm
Compress::Raw::Bzip2 provides an interface to the in-memory
compression/uncompression functions from the bzip2 compression library.
Comment 1 Andreas Thienemann 2007-03-17 15:14:49 EDT
+ source files match upstream:    ebe26a1ca9aae874eada7636cf779d33 
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream.
+ license is "GPL or Artistic".
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are being used.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installs properly
+ debuginfo package contains data.
+ rpmlint is silent.
+ final provides and requires are sane:
== provides
perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 = 2.004-1.fc7
== requires
perl >= 0:5.004
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
- %check is present and all supported tests pass. However, Test::POD would be
useful as a BR
        all skipped: Test::Pod 1.00 required for testing POD
All tests successful, 1 test skipped.
Files=3, Tests=158,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.27 cusr +  0.05 csys =  0.32 CPU)
+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
+ no duplication of system libraries.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ no headers.
+ no pkgconfig files.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
+ not a GUI app.

MUST and SHOULD parts do look okay. I would suggest however adding a
BuildRequire for perl(Test::POD). That way you can prevent the skipping of the
third test.
Otherwise you can consider that package approved.
Comment 2 Steven Pritchard 2007-06-27 17:25:39 EDT
It looks like we got some wires crossed here...  There's a 
perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 in rawhide now that isn't this package.
Comment 3 Steven Pritchard 2007-06-27 18:20:48 EDT
Oops, closed with the wrong resolution.