Bug 2330617

Summary: Review Request: tk8 - The graphical toolkit for the Tcl scripting language, version 8
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Miro Hrončok <mhroncok>
Status: RELEASE_PENDING --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: mhroncok, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: mhroncok: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://tcl.sourceforge.net
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8344730 to 8373816 none

Description Jaroslav Škarvada 2024-12-05 17:14:21 UTC
Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/tk8/tk8.spec
SRPM URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/tk8/tk8-8.6.15-2.fc42.src.rpm
Description: When paired with the Tcl scripting language, Tk provides a fast and powerful way to create cross-platform GUI applications.
Fedora Account System Username: jskarvad

For: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/TclTk9.0

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-12-05 17:24:57 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8344730
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2330617-tk8/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08344730-tk8/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file license.terms is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Package has .a files: tk8-devel. Does not provide -static: tk8-devel.
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Miro Hrončok 2024-12-10 18:21:53 UTC
> BuildRequires: tcl-devel = %{epoch}:%{vers}, autoconf

Consider explicitly BuildRequireing tcl8-devel.

Other comments from bz2330615 also apply here (including Obsoletes for tile).

Comment 3 Jaroslav Škarvada 2024-12-10 22:21:58 UTC
Thanks for the review.

New version:
Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/tk8/tk8.spec
SRPM URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/tk8/tk8-8.6.15-3.fc42.src.rpm

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2024-12-10 22:24:20 UTC
Created attachment 2061975 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8344730 to 8373816

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2024-12-10 22:24:23 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8373816
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2330617-tk8/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08373816-tk8/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Miro Hrončok 2024-12-11 16:51:01 UTC
Package APPROVED.

Comment 7 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2025-01-14 13:02:49 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tk8