Bug 2332263

Summary: Review Request: mkdocs-bootswatch - Bootswatch themes for MkDocs
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Davide Cavalca <davide>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Michel Lind <michel>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: michel, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: michel: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: http://mkdocs.github.io/mkdocs-bootswatch
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-12-16 11:58:52 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Davide Cavalca 2024-12-13 11:12:20 UTC
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/mkdocs-bootswatch/mkdocs-bootswatch.spec
SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/mkdocs-bootswatch/mkdocs-bootswatch-1.1-7.src.rpm

Description:
Bootswatch themes for MkDocs.

Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2024-12-13 11:12:23 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=126792958

Comment 2 Davide Cavalca 2024-12-13 11:12:40 UTC
This package will need to be unretired: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mkdocs-bootswatch

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2024-12-13 11:15:00 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8389600
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2332263-mkdocs-bootswatch/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08389600-mkdocs-bootswatch/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Michel Lind 2024-12-13 11:58:28 UTC
Package was unretired and the diff from the previous spec (F35) is reasonable, simplifying the review.

- package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
- test suite is run and all unit tests pass
- latest version of the sotware is packaged
- license matches upstream specification (BSD-2-Clause AND MIT) and is acceptable for Fedora
- license file is included with %license in %files
  note - only BSD-2-Clause? I can't see the MIT license file
- package complies with the Python Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

===

Recommended post-import python-packagers-sig tasks (use `fedora-sig-onboard onboard pkgname`:

- add @python-packagers-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer

- track package in koschei for all built branches

Comment 5 Michel Lind 2024-12-13 12:01:53 UTC
Ah. so there are two license files

/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/mkdocs_bootswatch-1.1.dist-info/LICENSE gets automatically bundled

bootswatch.LICENSE (which is MIT) does not get automatically bundled so you need to add this by hand

Comment 6 Davide Cavalca 2024-12-13 12:02:29 UTC
Unretirement ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12502

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2024-12-16 11:56:06 UTC
FEDORA-2024-d0bc2f3c92 (mkdocs-bootswatch-1.1-7.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-d0bc2f3c92

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2024-12-16 11:58:52 UTC
FEDORA-2024-d0bc2f3c92 (mkdocs-bootswatch-1.1-7.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.