Bug 2339428

Summary: [RFE] Option to not create Object credentials when creating a user via the radosgw-admin CLI
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Jiffin <jthottan>
Component: RGWAssignee: Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Madhavi Kasturi <mkasturi>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.1CC: ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, dparkes, dwalveka, jthottan, mbenjamin, mkasturi, tserlin, vereddy
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: 7.1z3Flags: mkasturi: needinfo+
dwalveka: needinfo? (mbenjamin)
dwalveka: needinfo? (mbenjamin)
dwalveka: needinfo? (mbenjamin)
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-18.2.1-288.el9cp Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
RGW users can be created without a key using the radosgw-admin command-line Previously, there was no provision to create RGW users without a key using the radosgw-admin command-line. This feature is available for the adminops. With this enhancement, the provision to create RGW users without a keyis provided on the command-line if `--generate-key false` flag is set to `radosgw-admin user create`.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2314403 Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-02-24 15:41:09 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2314403    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Jiffin 2025-01-22 11:46:54 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2314403 +++

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2025-02-24 15:41:09 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 7.1 security, bug fix, enhancement, and known issue updates), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:1770