Bug 2314403
| Summary: | [RFE] Option to not create Object credentials when creating a user via the radosgw-admin CLI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | daniel parkes <dparkes> | |
| Component: | RGW | Assignee: | Jiffin <jthottan> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Madhavi Kasturi <mkasturi> | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | |||
| Version: | 7.1 | CC: | bhkaur, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, jthottan, mbenjamin, rpollack, tserlin | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature | |
| Target Release: | 8.0z2 | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | ceph-19.2.0-90.el9cp | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: |
.Users can be created without a key using the radosgw-admin command-line
Previously, there was no provision to create Ceph Object Gateway (RGW) users without a key using the radosgw-admin command-line. This feature was only available for the adminops.
With this enhancement, the provision to create RGW users without a key is provided on the command-line when `--generate-key false` flag is set to `radosgw-admin user create`.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 2339428 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-03-06 14:22:26 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 2339428 | |||
|
Description
daniel parkes
2024-09-24 09:28:32 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.0 security, bug fixes, and enhancement updates), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:2457 |