Bug 2346194

Summary:	cephadm: patches for IBM cloud
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Adam King <adking>
Component:	Cephadm	Assignee:	Adam King <adking>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Manisha Saini <msaini>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:	Rivka Pollack <rpollack>
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	8.0	CC:	cephqe-warriors, mobisht, msaini, rpollack, tserlin
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	8.0z3
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ceph-19.2.0-103.el9cp	Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	2351180 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2025-04-07 15:26:29 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2351180
Bug Blocks:

Description Adam King 2025-02-17 21:10:19 UTC

BZ for tracking cephadm changes requested by IBM cloud team for 8.0z3. Requested patches were

Port detection on daemon creation https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61570 

Multi-label placement https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/59114 

Server_scope https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61571 

Monitoring port https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61578 

QOS support https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61283

(+ an stunnel patch I don't think can make this release)

As far as testing, we're already testing NFS QoS generally elsewhere. Beyond that, the multi-label placements could probably use testing. That includes a new "labels" parameter for the placement of service spec that allows users to specify a list of labels instead of one individual label. It also adds a "count_per_label" placement parameter. That allow specifying how many daemons should be deployed per label specified in the "labels" parameter. E.g. if you had 5 hosts each with label "A" and "B" and you specified

labels:
  - A
  - B
count_per_label: 3

it would deploy that daemon on 3 of the 5 hosts labeled A and 3 of the 5 hosts labeled B.

Comment 1 Storage PM bot 2025-02-17 21:10:28 UTC

Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2025-04-07 15:26:29 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement updates), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3635