Bug 2348494
| Summary: | Please branch and build rust-netlink-packet-core in epel9 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michel Lind <michel> |
| Component: | rust-netlink-packet-core | Assignee: | Michel Lind <michel> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | decathorpe, ferferna, fge, rust-sig |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | rust-netlink-packet-core-0.7.0-1.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-02-28 02:59:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2348498 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 2347633, 2348495 | ||
|
Description
Michel Lind
2025-02-27 00:51:49 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-5f9e15bf06 (rust-below-0.9.0-1.el9, rust-below-btrfs-0.9.0-1.el9, and 18 more) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-5f9e15bf06 Hi Michel Lind, The RHEL packaging is using `cargo vendor`, I think we should do the same for EPEL 9/10. Is there a Fedora decision on using crate packaging instead of vendoring? > I think we should do the same for EPEL 9/10. This ship has sailed years ago. Rust packaging in EPEL 9 and 10 matches what we do in Fedora. > Is there a Fedora decision on using crate packaging instead of vendoring? The default policy of not bundling dependencies (if possible) applies. (In reply to Gris Ge from comment #2) > Hi Michel Lind, > > The RHEL packaging is using `cargo vendor`, I think we should do the same > for EPEL 9/10. > > Is there a Fedora decision on using crate packaging instead of vendoring? Is there a reason to vendor in EPEL? I understand why RHEL wants to go that way, but in EPEL it makes it so much easier to just package the same way as in Fedora FEDORA-EPEL-2025-5f9e15bf06 (rust-below-0.9.0-1.el9, rust-below-btrfs-0.9.0-1.el9, and 18 more) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |