FEDORA-EPEL-2025-5f9e15bf06 (rust-below-0.9.0-1.el9, rust-below-btrfs-0.9.0-1.el9, and 18 more) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-5f9e15bf06

Hi Michel Lind,

The RHEL packaging is using `cargo vendor`, I think we should do the same for EPEL 9/10.

Is there a Fedora decision on using crate packaging instead of vendoring?

> I think we should do the same for EPEL 9/10.

This ship has sailed years ago. Rust packaging in EPEL 9 and 10 matches what we do in Fedora.

> Is there a Fedora decision on using crate packaging instead of vendoring?

The default policy of not bundling dependencies (if possible) applies.

(In reply to Gris Ge from comment #2)
> Hi Michel Lind,
> 
> The RHEL packaging is using `cargo vendor`, I think we should do the same
> for EPEL 9/10.
> 
> Is there a Fedora decision on using crate packaging instead of vendoring?

Is there a reason to vendor in EPEL? I understand why RHEL wants to go that way, but in EPEL it makes it so much easier to just package the same way as in Fedora

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-5f9e15bf06 (rust-below-0.9.0-1.el9, rust-below-btrfs-0.9.0-1.el9, and 18 more) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.