Bug 235236
Summary: | Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jima <jima> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Chris Weyl <cweyl> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | i |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | jima:
fedora_requires_release_note?
cweyl: fedora-review+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-04-09 15:25:14 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jima
2007-04-04 17:15:42 UTC
As cweyl found in this package's sibling review (aoetools, BZ#235234), the Fedora compiler flags weren't being honored, so I've released the following update: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/vblade/vblade.spec http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/vblade/vblade-14-2.fc6.src.rpm Ok, as a storage geek in a previous (and maybe future) life, I'm finding this pretty cool :) There is a contrib directory -- but as it's a source patch, it's probably not something to stick in %doc. Not that it is, I'm just saying. :) + source files match upstream: c5c7ed7b859d6d74575dd9facd82e2a1 vblade-14.tgz c5c7ed7b859d6d74575dd9facd82e2a1 rpms/vblade/vblade-14.tgz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. (GPL) License text included. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate (as tweaked :) ) + %clean is present. + package installs properly + debuginfo package looks complete. + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** vblade-14-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides config(vblade) = 14-2.fc6 vblade = 14-2.fc6 == requires /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service config(vblade) = 14-2.fc6 libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) ** vblade-debuginfo-14-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides vblade-debuginfo = 14-2.fc6 == requires O no %check -- but no tests either. + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + scriptlets look sane. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. APPROVED Did someone get the license plate of that reviewer? Came outta nowhere... Thanks for the speedy review. Flagging CVS and release notes (again, having this in Fedora might be worth noting). The template might help, sorry: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vblade Short Description: Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon Owners: jima.org Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: vblade-14-2 built in devel just fine; closing this review out. Thanks again! Oops, Firefox caching seemed to reset fedora‑cvs to ?; unsetting. Note in F7 release notes under "PackageNotes". Thanks for thinking of us. :) Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: vblade New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 cvs done. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: vblade Short Description: Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon Owners: cicku Branches: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: vblade New Branches: f20 Owners: cicku Package is retired and would require re-review. |