Bug 2362264

Summary:	Please branch and build rclone in epel10
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	James Reilly <jreilly1821>
Component:	rclone	Assignee:	Mikel Olasagasti Uranga <mikel>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel10	CC:	benjamin, carl, go-sig, mikel
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	rclone-1.70.3-1.el10_1	Doc Type:	---
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2025-08-04 01:17:43 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description James Reilly 2025-04-25 07:32:44 UTC

Please branch and build rclone in epel10.

If you do not wish to maintain rclone in epel10,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS jreilly1821);
please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/restic/adduser

Comment 1 James Reilly 2025-05-23 07:31:46 UTC

Will you be able to branch and build rclone in epel10?
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish
to build it on epel10 (FAS: jreilly1821).

Comment 2 Carl George 🎩 2025-06-09 17:07:51 UTC

The maintainer won't be able to add you as a co-maintainer because you're not in the packagers group.  Here's a guide for accomplishing that.

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/

Comment 3 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2025-06-09 21:32:43 UTC

*** Bug 2371172 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2025-06-09 21:38:49 UTC

As part of the Go SIG, we have proposed a system-wide change for how Go applications are packaged:

https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-golang-packages-vendored-by-default-system-wide/154986

Although the change is primarily intended for Fedora, the plan is to apply it to EPEL as well. Packaging rclone unvendored in EPEL is not a viable option. If vendoring is necessary, using the same method as in Fedora helps reduce maintenance overhead. Once the change is approved and go-vendor-tools is available for EPEL it should be easy to have rclone in EPEL10.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2025-07-28 20:07:09 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-c084f6b5a7 (rclone-1.70.3-1.el10_1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-c084f6b5a7

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2025-07-29 04:11:48 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-c084f6b5a7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-c084f6b5a7

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2025-08-04 01:17:43 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-c084f6b5a7 (rclone-1.70.3-1.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.