Bug 236517
Summary: | Update to 0.96.96? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nigel Jones <dev> |
Component: | scons | Assignee: | Gérard Milmeister <gemi> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6 | CC: | che666, mszpak |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-05-21 20:23:49 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Nigel Jones
2007-04-15 21:25:09 UTC
Isn't version 0.97 due soon? it would be great though if i an update could happen anyways if theres not reason not to upgrade the package. so the other packages in preparation can be finished and reviewed in time. Before I upgrade the package, I would like to know if there is a chance that other package builds might fail. (In reply to comment #3) > Before I upgrade the package, I would like to know if there is a chance that > other package builds might fail. I shall attempt to look into this, but I don't know of any regressions. It might be wise to post a message on fedora-maintainers to prewarn and check though. The SCons Foundation released the new "stable" version of Scons - 0.97. https://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=509219 Updated to 0.97. |