Bug 2367961

Summary:	Please branch and build python-markupsafe in EPEL 10.
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Enrique <cquike>
Component:	python-markupsafe	Assignee:	Miro Hrončok <mhroncok>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	42	CC:	code, mhroncok, python-packagers-sig
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	---
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2025-05-22 11:24:53 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2367955

Description Enrique 2025-05-22 10:53:24 UTC

Please branch and build python-markupsafe in EPEL 10.

I would like to request a python package for markupsafe (https://markupsafe.palletsprojects.com/) similar to the existing packages in Fedora (python3-markupsafe).

Thanks!


Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Enrique 2025-05-22 11:20:18 UTC

I just realized there is a markupsafe package in AlmaLinux 10 AppStream: https://vault.almalinux.org/10.0-beta/AppStream/x86_64/os/Packages/python3-markupsafe-2.1.3-5.el10.x86_64.rpm

Maybe this means there is no need  for EPEL to provide one?

Comment 2 Ben Beasley 2025-05-22 11:24:53 UTC

See also https://tiny.distro.builders/view-rpm--view-c10s--python3-markupsafe.html; similarly to bug 2367957, python3-markupsafe-2.1.3-6.el10 is indeed in AppStream.

Packages that are in AppStream or CRB repos are “in RHEL,” and are not eligible for EPEL. You’re expected to enable those repos instead. EPEL packages are built with both repos enabled.

Comment 3 Enrique 2025-05-22 11:32:29 UTC

Thanks for the info!
And sorry for the extra noise.