Bug 237077
Summary: | [RHEL 5] pygtk2 bug in 2.10.1 (fixed in 2.10.3) causes Revelation to crash | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Dag Wieers <dag> | ||||
Component: | pygtk2 | Assignee: | Matthew Barnes <mbarnes> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 5.0 | CC: | bugzilla, katzj | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened | ||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
URL: | http://mail.codepoet.no/archives/revelation-list/2007-March/000362.html | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | RHBA-2008-0079 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-01-23 13:59:42 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 242652 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Dag Wieers
2007-04-19 11:08:34 UTC
Hmm, the pygtk-2.10.3 announcement claims the crasher was introduced in 2.10.2. This bug is filed against 2.10.1. In any case, it shouldn't be too hard to backport subsequent pygtk fixes. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. Since this bugzilla is in a component that is not approved for the current release, it has been closed with resolution deferred. You may reopen this bugzilla for consideration in the next release. I have no idea what Red Hat Product Management is trying to say here. Bugs in pygtk2 (a RHEL component) are not considered for exactly what reason ? (Matthew: yes, apparently the ChangeLog does not correctly reflect the version that introduced the problem.) This is just Red Hat's horrible policy of closing bugs that aren't going to make it into the next RHEL update. It just means that we've taken on all the bugs we can handle for 5.1, and this one will have to wait until a subsequent update. Resetting flags and proposing this for 5.2. [Just a quarterly reminder that this bug needs fixing.] Can we expect an update in bugzilla when someone comes around and looks at it ? Or is it possible that somehow without any progress in this bugreport, 5.2 comes out with a fix ? I'm just asking because I fear 5.2 will not fix this bug if something isn't happening here. Would a fix show up in fastrack regardless of this report ? I'll make sure it gets fixed for 5.2, assuming Product Management approves it. I think they're still pretty focused on 5.1 at the moment. This time next month we should start to see some action. Created attachment 211551 [details] Patch for pygtk2-2.10.1 that backports the relevant code from pytk2-2.10.2. This patch backports the relevant bits from pygtk2 2.10.2 to 2.10.1. The resulting packages for RHEL5 will e available from: http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/pygtk2/ until it gets fixed upstream. Found the corresponding upstream bug for this: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347273 Fixed in pygtk2-2.10.1-9.el5 An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0079.html |