Bug 2372511

Summary: Review Request: python-spdx-license-list - SPDX License List as a Python dictionary
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://pypi.org/project/spdx-license-list/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2356888    
Attachments:
Description Flags
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9157224 to 9157388
none
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9157388 to 9157443 none

Description Yaakov Selkowitz 2025-06-12 16:39:24 UTC 
Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/python-spdx-license-list.spec
SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/python-spdx-license-list-3.26.0-1.fc43.src.rpm
Description: Provides the SPDX License List as a Python dictionary.  (This will be a new dependency of eric.)
Fedora Account System Username: yselkowitz
Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-12 16:42:34 UTC 
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9157224
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2372511-python-spdx-license-list/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09157224-python-spdx-license-list/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file INSTALLER is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Comment 2 Yaakov Selkowitz 2025-06-12 17:20:24 UTC 
Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/python-spdx-license-list.spec
SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/python-spdx-license-list-3.26.0-1.fc43.src.rpm
Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-12 17:23:36 UTC 
Created attachment 2093796 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9157224 to 9157388
Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-12 17:23:38 UTC 
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9157388
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2372511-python-spdx-license-list/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09157388-python-spdx-license-list/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file INSTALLER is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Comment 5 Yaakov Selkowitz 2025-06-12 18:00:31 UTC 
Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/python-spdx-license-list.spec
SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/python-spdx-license-list-3.26.0-1.fc43.src.rpm
Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-12 18:03:41 UTC 
Created attachment 2093812 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9157388 to 9157443
Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-12 18:03:43 UTC 
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9157443
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2372511-python-spdx-license-list/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09157443-python-spdx-license-list/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file INSTALLER is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.