Bug 2372511 - Review Request: python-spdx-license-list - SPDX License List as a Python dictionary
Summary: Review Request: python-spdx-license-list - SPDX License List as a Python dict...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://pypi.org/project/spdx-license...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2356888
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-06-12 16:39 UTC by Yaakov Selkowitz
Modified: 2025-06-12 18:03 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9157224 to 9157388 (1.33 KB, patch)
2025-06-12 17:23 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9157388 to 9157443 (263 bytes, patch)
2025-06-12 18:03 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Yaakov Selkowitz 2025-06-12 16:39:24 UTC
Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/python-spdx-license-list.spec
SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/python-spdx-license-list-3.26.0-1.fc43.src.rpm
Description: Provides the SPDX License List as a Python dictionary.  (This will be a new dependency of eric.)
Fedora Account System Username: yselkowitz

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-12 16:42:34 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9157224
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2372511-python-spdx-license-list/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09157224-python-spdx-license-list/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file INSTALLER is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-12 17:23:36 UTC
Created attachment 2093796 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9157224 to 9157388

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-12 17:23:38 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9157388
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2372511-python-spdx-license-list/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09157388-python-spdx-license-list/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file INSTALLER is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-12 18:03:41 UTC
Created attachment 2093812 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9157388 to 9157443

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-12 18:03:43 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9157443
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2372511-python-spdx-license-list/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09157443-python-spdx-license-list/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file INSTALLER is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.