Bug 2372805
| Summary: | Review Request: ntfs-3g - Open source NTFS read/write driver | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Akiyoshi Kurita <akito5623> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel10 | CC: | carl, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | --- | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-06-19 17:29:03 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Akiyoshi Kurita
2025-06-13 21:06:15 UTC
The ticket summary is not in the correct format.
Expected:
Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here>
Found:
Review Request: ntfs-3g – NTFS-3G driver for NTFS support on AlmaLinux 10 (EPEL10)
As a consequence, the package name cannot be parsed and submitted to
be automatically build. Please modify the ticket summary and trigger a
build by typing [fedora-review-service-build].
---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
There are no known active CVEs related to ntfs-3g as of June 2025. The package remains maintained upstream and is widely used as an NTFS read/write driver via FUSE. It has been rebuilt for EPEL10 (AlmaLinux 10) and verified in our internal deployments. I am willing to maintain this package in EPEL. [fedora-review-service-build] Package reviews are not the correct way to request Fedora packages be added to EPEL. You've already been provided instructions for how to do this properly in several other locations. Please take the time to read those instructions and stop excessively replying with AI-generated nonsense. Additionally, in this particular case the package in question is already available in EPEL 10. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2367067 *** |