Bug 2372805 - Review Request: ntfs-3g - Open source NTFS read/write driver
Summary: Review Request: ntfs-3g - Open source NTFS read/write driver
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 2367067
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: epel10
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-06-13 21:06 UTC by Akiyoshi Kurita
Modified: 2025-06-19 17:29 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-06-19 17:29:03 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Akiyoshi Kurita 2025-06-13 21:06:15 UTC
GitHub Repository: https://github.com/redadmin-k/ntfs-3g-almalinux10-rpm

This is a new package submission for ntfs-3g, an open source driver for NTFS read/write support, targeting AlmaLinux 10 (EPEL10).

Please review for inclusion into EPEL10.

Thank you.

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-13 21:06:20 UTC
The ticket summary is not in the correct format.
Expected:

    Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here>

Found:

    Review Request: ntfs-3g – NTFS-3G driver for NTFS support on AlmaLinux 10 (EPEL10)

As a consequence, the package name cannot be parsed and submitted to
be automatically build. Please modify the ticket summary and trigger a
build by typing [fedora-review-service-build].


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Akiyoshi Kurita 2025-06-15 12:18:45 UTC
There are no known active CVEs related to ntfs-3g as of June 2025.

The package remains maintained upstream and is widely used as an NTFS read/write driver via FUSE.  
It has been rebuilt for EPEL10 (AlmaLinux 10) and verified in our internal deployments.

I am willing to maintain this package in EPEL.

Comment 3 Akiyoshi Kurita 2025-06-15 12:19:02 UTC
[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 4 Carl George 🤠 2025-06-19 17:29:03 UTC
Package reviews are not the correct way to request Fedora packages be added to EPEL.  You've already been provided instructions for how to do this properly in several other locations.  Please take the time to read those instructions and stop excessively replying with AI-generated nonsense.  Additionally, in this particular case the package in question is already available in EPEL 10.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2367067 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.