Bug 2373294

Summary: Review Request: eswin-firmware - ESWIN Computing early boot firmware
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Yanko Kaneti <yaneti>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review, philip.wyett
Target Milestone: ---Flags: philip.wyett: fedora-review?
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://github.com/eswincomputing/Esbd-77serial-firmware/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9178971 to 9178977 none

Description Yanko Kaneti 2025-06-17 23:02:50 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/eswin-firmware/eswin-firmware.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/eswin-firmware/eswin-firmware-20250618-6.fc43.src.rpm
Description: ESWIN Computing firmware for EIC770x SOCs early boot
and eventually other chips
Fedora Account System Username: yaneti

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-18 10:22:11 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9178971
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2373294-eswin-firmware/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09178971-eswin-firmware/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-18 10:25:29 UTC
Created attachment 2094229 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9178971 to 9178977

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2025-06-18 10:25:32 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9178977
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2373294-eswin-firmware/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09178977-eswin-firmware/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 Phil Wyett 2026-03-01 11:11:05 UTC
Hi,

Thought I would have a look at this one.

* No homepage in spec file.

Homepage: https://www.eswincomputing.com/en/

* Curious about not installing under 'lib/firmware'?

* %changelog for first package should declare 'Initial RPM packaging' or similar.

  - %changelog entries need to be informative and not short and misleading.

Regards

Phil

Comment 6 Phil Wyett 2026-03-01 11:12:58 UTC
(In reply to Phil Wyett from comment #5)
> Hi,
> 
> Thought I would have a look at this one.
> 
> * No homepage in spec file.
> 
> Homepage: https://www.eswincomputing.com/en/

Ignore the above, I misread the spec.

> 
> * Curious about not installing under 'lib/firmware'?
> 
> * %changelog for first package should declare 'Initial RPM packaging' or
> similar.
> 
>   - %changelog entries need to be informative and not short and misleading.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Phil

Comment 7 Yanko Kaneti 2026-03-01 15:06:55 UTC
(In reply to Phil Wyett from comment #5)
Hello, thanks for taking a look

> * Curious about not installing under 'lib/firmware'?

If you mean /usr/lib/firmware,  that's the location for kernel loaded firmware
The eswin firmware is a different kind of firmware that's only usefull as a building block.

> * %changelog for first package should declare 'Initial RPM packaging' or
> similar.
> 
>   - %changelog entries need to be informative and not short and misleading.

The spec has %autochangelog , the first entry will be the the git meesage on first commit..