Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Review Request: bluedj - An online game centre|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Yijun Yuan <bbbush.yuan>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2008-01-27 21:55:09 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Yijun Yuan 2007-04-22 10:23:24 EDT
Spec URL: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/bluedj.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/bluedj-3.1.2-5.fc7.src.rpm Description: BlueDJ is an online game centre that is written with Qt. It runs on different platforms including handheld. The games are relaxing and easy. There are 14 games distributed with the platform. More games could be downloaded from server if available. To play games on this platform you must register to the network first. After that everything is easy to use: On the left panel there is the game list and server list. Click anyone to join in a server, then choose a seat and wait others ready to start. Most games would require 4 people, but you can also choose AI players for some games.
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2007-06-01 01:33:37 EDT
OK, how did this get fedora-review set to '?' if nobody is reviewing it? I don't think anyone would ever have even noticed this package except that I'm cleaning up the "under review" list. I'll set the flag back to what it should be.
Comment 2 Yijun Yuan 2007-06-01 04:21:53 EDT
Some one told me to use flags instead of blockers. Do you mean this flag can only be set by the self assigned reviewer? If it don't block FE_NEW who will notice it? I'd thank you for your help.
Comment 3 Yijun Yuan 2007-06-01 04:44:38 EDT
(In reply to comment #2) > Some one told me to use flags instead of blockers. Do you mean this flag can > only be set by the self assigned reviewer? If it don't block FE_NEW who will > notice it? > > I'd thank you for your help. reply to myself: reading http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess #3, "Wait for someone to review your package! At this point in the process, the fedora-review flag is blank, meaning that no reviewer is assigned." Ahhh, anyone please review it! //bow
Comment 4 Till Maas 2007-09-08 09:05:54 EDT
- You use spaces and tabs in the spec, please only use one of them. It seems to be easier to substitute the tabs with spaces, because there are less tab than space charachters. - When you do not build a -data package, then please remove the comments about it from the spec - Can you maybe provide a patch to create an install target with qmake to simplify the %install section - GPL is not a valid license tag value anymore: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8
Comment 5 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-12-19 09:28:00 EST
What is the status of this bug?
Comment 6 Mamoru TASAKA 2008-01-17 09:33:07 EST
Comment 7 Jason Tibbitts 2008-01-27 15:23:38 EST
I guess this is another one which should be closed. Mamoru, what do you think?
Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2008-01-27 21:55:09 EST
Okay. Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you!