Bug 237422 - Review Request: bluedj - An online game centre
Review Request: bluedj - An online game centre
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Package Reviews List
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-04-22 10:23 EDT by Yijun Yuan
Modified: 2008-01-27 21:55 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-01-27 21:55:09 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Yijun Yuan 2007-04-22 10:23:24 EDT
Spec URL: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/bluedj.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/bluedj-3.1.2-5.fc7.src.rpm
Description: BlueDJ is an online game centre that is written with Qt. It runs on different platforms including handheld. The games are relaxing and easy. There are 14 games distributed with the platform. More games could be downloaded from server if available.

To play games on this platform you must register to the network first. After that everything is easy to use: On the left panel there is the game list and server list. Click anyone to join in a server, then choose a seat and wait others ready to start. Most games would require 4 people, but you can also choose AI players for some games.
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2007-06-01 01:33:37 EDT
OK, how did this get fedora-review set to '?' if nobody is reviewing it?  I
don't think anyone would ever have even noticed this package except that I'm
cleaning up the "under review" list.

I'll set the flag back to what it should be.
Comment 2 Yijun Yuan 2007-06-01 04:21:53 EDT
Some one told me to use flags instead of blockers. Do you mean this flag can
only be set by the self assigned reviewer? If it don't block FE_NEW who will
notice it?

I'd thank you for your help.
Comment 3 Yijun Yuan 2007-06-01 04:44:38 EDT
(In reply to comment #2)
> Some one told me to use flags instead of blockers. Do you mean this flag can
> only be set by the self assigned reviewer? If it don't block FE_NEW who will
> notice it?
> 
> I'd thank you for your help.

reply to myself: 
reading http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess #3, "Wait for someone
to review your package! At this point in the process, the fedora-review flag is
blank, meaning that no reviewer is assigned."

Ahhh, anyone please review it! //bow
Comment 4 Till Maas 2007-09-08 09:05:54 EDT
- You use spaces and tabs in the spec, please only use one of them. It seems to
be easier to substitute the tabs with spaces, because there are less tab than
space charachters.

- When you do not build a -data package, then please remove the comments about
it from the spec

- Can you maybe provide a patch to create an install target with qmake to
simplify the %install section

- GPL is not a valid license tag value anymore:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8
Comment 5 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-12-19 09:28:00 EST
What is the status of this bug?
Comment 6 Mamoru TASAKA 2008-01-17 09:33:07 EST
Someone ping?
Comment 7 Jason Tibbitts 2008-01-27 15:23:38 EST
I guess this is another one which should be closed.  Mamoru, what do you think?
Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2008-01-27 21:55:09 EST
Okay. Once closing.

If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new
review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one.

Thank you!

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.