Bug 237726
Summary: | broken URL in xml-common package description | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | petrosyan |
Component: | sgml-common | Assignee: | Ondrej Vasik <ovasik> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fnasser |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-05-28 14:24:33 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 237018 |
Description
petrosyan
2007-04-24 23:34:05 UTC
We never released a 0.6.3 of xml-commons (note the 's'), and certainly not a xml-common-0.6.3-19. Where did you get this RPM from? this RPM comes from sgml-common Hum, we have an xml-commons from the Java stack on Fedora and RHEL, and a xml-common (no 's') in addition to that. And worse, the subpackage name does not match the SRPM name, which is always a bad thing. To whoever owns sgml-commin: we should talk about renaming this subpackage or reusing the DTDs installed by the Java one. URL will be changed to http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/ (some other distributions are using docbook-tools homepage, which is imho wrong, this is one is better). Because of very low severity I will fix that URL with next build in devel branch of Fedora. fnasser: We could talk about renaming, but I would like to keep it as it is - it is old product, with almost unactive upstream and maybe this could break some strict dependencies somewhere. When you use rpm -qi xml-common, you have displayed that it is coming from sgml-common rpm, so I see no real problem. But feel free to contact me. Closing as NEXTRELEASE OK, under the cirscunstances I guess we can keep it as it is. Thanks for the clarification. |