Bug 237726

Summary:	broken URL in xml-common package description
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	petrosyan
Component:	sgml-common	Assignee:	Ondrej Vasik <ovasik>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fnasser
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-05-28 14:24:33 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	237018

Description petrosyan 2007-04-24 23:34:05 UTC

Description of problem:
broken URL in xml-common package description
URL         : http://www.iso.ch/cate/3524030.html

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xml-common-0.6.3-19

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
rpm -qi xml-common

Comment 1 Fernando Nasser 2007-04-25 15:55:07 UTC

We never released a 0.6.3 of xml-commons (note the 's'), and certainly not a
xml-common-0.6.3-19.

Where did you get this RPM from?

Comment 2 petrosyan 2007-04-25 20:43:08 UTC

this RPM comes from sgml-common

Comment 3 Fernando Nasser 2007-04-25 21:06:39 UTC

Hum, we have an xml-commons from the Java stack on Fedora and RHEL, and a
xml-common (no 's') in addition to that.  And worse, the subpackage name does
not match the SRPM name, which is always a bad thing.

To whoever owns sgml-commin: we should talk about renaming this subpackage or
reusing the DTDs installed by the Java one.

Comment 4 Ondrej Vasik 2007-05-28 14:24:33 UTC

URL will be changed to http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/ (some other
distributions are using docbook-tools homepage, which is imho wrong, this is one
is better). Because of very low severity I will fix that URL with next build in
devel branch of Fedora. 

fnasser: We could talk about renaming, but I would like to keep it as it is - it
is old product, with almost unactive upstream and maybe this could break some
strict dependencies somewhere. When you use rpm -qi xml-common, you have
displayed that it is coming from sgml-common rpm, so I see no real problem. But
feel free to contact me. 

Closing as NEXTRELEASE

Comment 5 Fernando Nasser 2007-12-05 20:59:07 UTC

OK, under the cirscunstances I guess we can keep it as it is.  Thanks for the
clarification.