Bug 2380702

Summary:	leatherman: FTBFS with change proposal CMake 4.0
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Cristian Le <fedora>
Component:	leatherman	Assignee:	Gwyn Ciesla <gwync>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	gwync
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	---
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2025-07-16 19:05:21 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2376114

Description Cristian Le 2025-07-16 10:42:44 UTC

\
Dear package maintainer,

This is an automated bug created due to a FTBFS when rebuilding this package for the change proposal CMake 4.0.

The rebuild is being tracked in https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/cmake-4.0.

See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake4.0 for more information on how to make the package compatible.

More specifically, depending on the state of the project:
- If it is actively maintained, please update the `cmake_minimum_required`, and instruct upstream to do so as well.
  To minimize future maintenance, please add a higher bound as well, preferrably with the highest CMake version being
  tested. You may use 4.0 as the higher bound as this is being tested in the tracked copr project.
- If the project is not maintained, you may add `CMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM=3.5` as a CMake variable or environment
  variable.

You can check the build locally following the instructions in the change proposal, or submit your build to the tracking
copr project.

Let me know if you encounter any issues, or need any other help.

Comment 1 Cristian Le 2025-07-16 19:19:57 UTC

Wondering if this project should be retired. I don't see other packages depending on it, and the README is concerning [1]. Probably there was some discussion on the mailing list about it that I didn't pay attention to?

[1]: https://github.com/puppetlabs/leatherman/pull/349

Comment 2 Gwyn Ciesla 2025-07-16 20:15:11 UTC

Interesting. I wasn't aware of that. I think I'll orphan it, and let the process run it's course. Thank you for the heads up.

Comment 3 Cristian Le 2025-07-16 20:24:55 UTC

Should probably open a discussion on the whole puppet pacakges, but probably there aren't any left, since this one was a leaf project.

Oh boy, some quotes age like milk

> At Puppet, open source software is in our DNA

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2025-07-16 20:40:11 UTC

Right? They were Salt Stack before Salt Stack was Salt Stack.