Bug 238374
| Summary: | yum processing of Conflicts: vs. arch choice. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | David Woodhouse <dwmw2> |
| Component: | yum | Assignee: | James Antill <james.antill> |
| Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 9 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-05-30 15:29:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 235752 | ||
|
Description
David Woodhouse
2007-04-29 23:06:34 UTC
Oh, I lie. It _does_ work with the skipbroken plugin if I actually add --skip-broken on the command line. Which version of yum was this with? rawhide: 3.1.7 Does this improve with multilib_policy=best? And other than a whitelist per-arch for things like kernel, gdb, etc or labeling the packages with a special provides I don't know of a way out of this particular problem. Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping closing as insufficient_data but I do believe we've made it _better_ than it was |