Bug 2392261
| Summary: | pandoc doesn't install its manual page | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | John Heidemann <johnh> |
| Component: | pandoc-cli | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 42 | CC: | castedo, michel, petersen |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Documentation, RFE |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.el10_2 pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.fc41 pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.el10_0 pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.el10_1 pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.1.fc42 | Doc Type: | --- |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-09-10 00:41:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Thank you - good report. Not quite sure how the manpage slipped out (though I had brought them back already for f43). I see it is also missing in f41 and epel10, sigh :-( FEDORA-2025-00c7a457f9 (pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-00c7a457f9 FEDORA-2025-98e2abbd03 (pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-98e2abbd03 FEDORA-EPEL-2025-6c742306ad (pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.el10_2) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.2. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-6c742306ad FEDORA-EPEL-2025-4750bf716d (pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.el10_1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-4750bf716d FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d7fdc98a0f (pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.el10_0) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d7fdc98a0f FEDORA-2025-00c7a457f9 has been pushed to the Fedora 42 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-00c7a457f9` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-00c7a457f9 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-6c742306ad has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.2 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-6c742306ad See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2025-98e2abbd03 has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-98e2abbd03` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-98e2abbd03 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d7fdc98a0f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d7fdc98a0f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-4750bf716d has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-4750bf716d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. Thanks. I confirm that the -34 release fixes this problem. An amazingly fast fix! FEDORA-2025-ee0ed2d73e has been pushed to the Fedora 42 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-ee0ed2d73e` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-ee0ed2d73e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-6c742306ad (pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.el10_2) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.2 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2025-98e2abbd03 (pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d7fdc98a0f (pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.el10_0) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-4750bf716d (pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2025-ee0ed2d73e (pandoc-cli-3.1.11.1-34.1.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |
The pandoc manual page is not installed, either from the pandoc rpm, nor from the pandoc-cli rpm, nor is there an obvious pandoc-doc rpm. The pandoc authors wrote an extensive manual page. I should be able to read it on my system and not be forced to the web. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf install pandoc pandoc-cli 2. man -k pandoc 3. Actual Results: man -k pandoc says: pandoc: nothing appropriate. Expected Results: I see the glorious documentation that appears as MANUAL.txt in the pandoc source code. Additional Information: Pandoc's INSTALL.md says: 5. Cabal does not install the `pandoc.1` man page, but you can copy it from the `man/` directory of the source code to `/usr/local/share/man/man1/` or wherever man pages go on your system. So presumably the spec needs to manually copy this file, and %files needs to be extended.