Bug 2393034
| Summary: | Please create python-urllib3-epel package with only Python extras in epel10 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | fedepell <fede> | ||||||
| Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Troy Dawson <tdawson> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
| Version: | epel10 | CC: | aurelien, carl, code, infra-sig, jeremy, kevin, mhroncok, python-maint, python-packagers-sig | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | --- | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2025-09-26 02:13:26 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | 2394056 | ||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
fedepell
2025-09-04 05:49:12 UTC
This package is already in RHEL10[1], so it is not eligible for inclusion in EPEL10. If it were important enough, it might be possible to create a python3-urllib-epel package with its version aligned to the RHEL10 package, and adjust it so that it *only* ships the “missing” extras metapackages. I’m not sure there is precedent for doing that solely for Python extras metapackages, but it would seem to be allowed[2]. I don’t think I’m interested in doing it myself, though. > Tests sadly still miss some deps (albeit only quart and quart-trio, maybe we could ask these to be built for EPEL as well? I maintain both of these in Fedora, along with python-hypercorn, upon which they depend. I would be happy to branch them all to EPEL10 if their dependencies were satisfied. Currently, python-hypercorn is missing at least python-aioquic and python-priority. [1] https://tiny.distro.builders/view-rpm--view-c10s--python3-urllib3.html [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-missing-sub-packages/ Thanks a lot Ben for the fast feedback! Sorry for overseeing that it was moved to RHEL10! Just to give some context: I was trying to have python-selenium (which is one of the many, slowly progressing, dependencies to have django) in EPEL10, which: ``` Problem 2: nothing provides requested (python3dist(urllib3[socks]) < 3~~ with python3dist(urllib3[socks]) >= 1.26) ``` I was surprised to not have (one of the two versions of) django in EPEL10/RHEL10 but so it seems (maybe rising this here will get me corrected :) ). WRT tests: I guess RHEL10 cannot depend on Fedora, so without these too being moved in RHEL it would still not work, right? Besides if we would do this proposed extras-only package for EPEL and run tests there, if that makes sense. I don't know if doing this python3-urlib-epel that packages just the extras is worth tho, as now we would have a new, EPEL only package for those. Will also check if selenium requirement in case can be relaxed Many thanks again for the fast and precious feedback! F. > I’m not sure there is precedent for doing that solely for Python extras metapackages... https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-jsonschema-epel/blob/epel10/f/python-jsonschema-epel.spec > Will also check if selenium requirement in case can be relaxed
It can likely be patched for a direct requirement on urllib3 + pysocks.
Created attachment 2105720 [details]
A working specfile
This is a working specfile forged from c10s with stripped changelog.
It builds successfully in epel10 with python3-pytest-freezegun from f40.
Created attachment 2105721 [details]
Specfile diff from c10s
s/forged/forked/ FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d28b99290e (python-urllib3-epel-1.26.19-2.el10_2) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.2. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d28b99290e FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d28b99290e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.2 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d28b99290e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d28b99290e (python-urllib3-epel-1.26.19-2.el10_2) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.2 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. Thanks Miro! |