Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Spec URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/python-urllib3-epel.spec SRPM URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/python-urllib3-epel-1.26.19-2.el10_2.src.rpm Description: This package exists to build metapackages with missing urllib3 extras in EPEL. Fedora Account System Username: churchyard
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9539684 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2394056-python-urllib3-epel/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09539684-python-urllib3-epel/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
This is blocked on python-pytest-freezegun. That package is mine and I can branch it in epel10.
I also opened https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/194 so I can get rid of the ugly %gsub one day.
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2) > This is blocked on python-pytest-freezegun. That package is mine and I can > branch it in epel10. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-9067102bef
sdie tag scratchbuild: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=136947215
FYI, this does qualify for a review exception under the third bullet point here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_exceptions That said, I'm happy to review the specific aspects of making this one of these special epel-only packages. The gsub trick is neat, it almost feels like too much magic, but I can understand the preference of doing that over listing out all the subpackages manually just to change the requires. I'm looking forward to using the %python_extras_subpkg -v in the future. Everything else checks out: * no source or binary package name conflict with CentOS/RHEL * no file conflicts with CentOS/RHEL * no obsoletes or provides of CentOS/RHEL packages To the extent I can approve a package that qualifies for a review exception, PACKAGE APPROVED.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-urllib3-epel/pull-request/1
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d28b99290e (python-urllib3-epel-1.26.19-2.el10_2) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.2. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d28b99290e
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d28b99290e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.2 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d28b99290e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d28b99290e (python-urllib3-epel-1.26.19-2.el10_2) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.2 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.