Bug 24013

Summary: no idea what happened...new user...any help appreciated
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Need Real Name <b3618>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Michael Fulbright <msf>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-01-16 00:32:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Need Real Name 2001-01-15 02:00:20 UTC
Traceback (innermost last):
  File "/var/tmp/anaconda-7.0.1//usr/lib/anaconda/iw/progress_gui.py", 
line 20, in run
    rc = self.todo.doInstall ()
  File "/var/tmp/anaconda-7.0.1//usr/lib/anaconda/todo.py", line 1664, in 
doInstall
    self.x.write (self.instPath + "/etc/X11")
  File "/var/tmp/anaconda-7.0.1//usr/lib/anaconda/xf86config.py", line 
895, in write
    config4 = self.Version4Config ()
  File "/var/tmp/anaconda-7.0.1//usr/lib/anaconda/xf86config.py", line 
1173, in Version4Config
    info["enableVariant"] = ""
NameError: info

Local variables in innermost frame:
data: {'screenModes': '\012\011Subsection "Display"\012        
\011Depth       16\012                
Modes       "1600x1200" "1280x1024" "1152x864" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x48
0" \012\011EndSubsection\012\012\011Subsection "Display"\012        
\011Depth       24\012                
Modes       "1600x1200" "1280x1024" "1152x864" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x48
0" \012\011EndSubsection\012\012\011Subsection "Display"\012        
\011Depth       8\012                
Modes       "1600x1200" "1280x1024" "1152x864" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x48
0" \012\011EndSubsection\012', 'videoRam': '', 'pex5Mod': '\012
\011Load "pex5"', 'XkbModel': 'microsoft', 'monitorVert': '50 - 
160', 'mouseDevice': 'psaux', 'cardVendor': 'Voodoo Banshee 
(generic)', 'cardsOptions': '\011# no known 
options', 'XkbRules': 'xfree86', 'cardBoardName': 'Voodoo Banshee 
(generic)', 'ia64Mods': '', 'XkbLayout': 'us', 'nonSparcMods': '\012
\011Load "fbdevhw"', 'defaultDepth': '', 'XkbOptions': '', 'cardID': 'Voodo
o Banshee 
(generic)', 'emulate3': 'no', 'enableOptions': '#', 'monitorHoriz': '30 - 
95', 'enableVariant': '#', 'XkbVariant': 'nodeadkeys', 'mouseProto': 'IMPS/
2', 'files': '\012# The location of the RGB database.  Note, this is the 
name of the\012# file minus the extension (like ".txt" or ".db").  There 
is normally\012# no need to change the default.\012\012    
RgbPath\011"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb"\012\012# Multiple FontPath entries are 
allowed (they are concatenated together)\012# By default, Red Hat 6.0 and 
later now use a font server independent of\012# the X server to render 
fonts.\012\012    FontPath   "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType"\012    
FontPath   "unix/:7100"\012'}
self: <xf86config.XF86Config instance at 829c498>
maxdepth: 24
res: 640x480
test: 0
mouseProto: IMPS/2
emulate3: no
modes: 
['1600x1200', '1280x1024', '1152x864', '1024x768', '800x600', '640x480']
depth: 8
screens: 
	Subsection "Display"
        	Depth       16
                
Modes       "1600x1200" "1280x1024" "1152x864" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x48
0" 
	EndSubsection

	Subsection "Display"
        	Depth       24
                
Modes       "1600x1200" "1280x1024" "1152x864" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x48
0" 
	EndSubsection

	Subsection "Display"
        	Depth       8
                
Modes       "1600x1200" "1280x1024" "1152x864" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x48
0" 
	EndSubsection


ToDo object:
(itodo
ToDo
p1
(dp2
S'method'
p3
(iimage
CdromInstallMethod
p4
(dp5
S'progressWindow'
p6

<failed>

Comment 1 Michael Fulbright 2001-01-16 00:32:20 UTC
Fixed in our internal tree.

I think this only happens if you pick the wrong video card.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21904 ***

Comment 2 Need Real Name 2001-01-19 22:10:32 UTC
Problem was from installation to a Hard Drive that also contained windows ME.  
Was able to resolve this by booting from floppy image , and doing a text based 
installation.  Hope this clears up any confusion..