Bug 2412372
| Summary: | Review Request: tauri-kit - A basic GUI for tauri development. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | 程安絮 <hippyandy> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, terjeros |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | --- | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
程安絮
2025-11-04 22:08:38 UTC
Cannot find any valid SRPM URL for this ticket. Common causes are: - You didn't specify `SRPM URL: ...` in the ticket description or any of your comments - The URL schema isn't HTTP or HTTPS - The SRPM package linked in your URL doesn't match the package name specified in the ticket summary --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. It's nothing here to start a review, please add links to spec file and srpm, or close the ticket. (In reply to Terje Rosten from comment #2) > It's nothing here to start a review, please add links to spec file and srpm, > or close the ticket. My apologies for the back and forth. I've now added the links to the spec file and SRPM. As this is my first package submission, it took me some time to navigate the process. Thank you for your understanding. For packaging of application written in rust, please read and follow: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Rust/ (In reply to Terje Rosten from comment #4) > For packaging of application written in rust, please read and follow: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Rust/ Thank you for sharing the link to the Fedora Rust Packaging Guidelines. I will read through the documentation carefully to ensure I properly understand the requirements and best practices for packaging Rust applications. This is a valuable resource, and I appreciate you pointing me to it. |