Bug 2412372 - Review Request: tauri-kit - A basic GUI for tauri development.
Summary: Review Request: tauri-kit - A basic GUI for tauri development.
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-11-04 22:08 UTC by 程安絮
Modified: 2025-11-09 04:15 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description 程安絮 2025-11-04 22:08:38 UTC
## Description
A basic GUI for tauri development.

## Guidelines
- [x] Complies with Fedora Packaging Guidelines.
- [x] License (AGPL-3.0-or-later) is approved.

## Package source
https://github.com/su-huai-an/tauri-kit/archive/refs/tags/tauri-kit-0.1.0.tar.gz

## Package spec
https://github.com/su-huai-an/tauri-kit/blob/tauri-kit-0.1.0/tauri-kit-0.1.0.spec

## Package SRPM
https://github.com/su-huai-an/tauri-kit/blob/tauri-kit-0.1.0/tauri-kit-0.1.0-1.fc41.src.rpm

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-04 22:09:01 UTC
Cannot find any valid SRPM URL for this ticket. Common causes are:

- You didn't specify `SRPM URL: ...` in the ticket description
  or any of your comments
- The URL schema isn't HTTP or HTTPS
- The SRPM package linked in your URL doesn't match the package name specified
  in the ticket summary


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Terje Rosten 2025-11-07 11:21:48 UTC
It's nothing here to start a review, please add links to spec file and srpm, or close the ticket.

Comment 3 程安絮 2025-11-08 12:10:17 UTC
(In reply to Terje Rosten from comment #2)
> It's nothing here to start a review, please add links to spec file and srpm,
> or close the ticket.

My apologies for the back and forth. I've now added the links to the spec file and SRPM. As this is my first package submission, it took me some time to navigate the process. Thank you for your understanding.

Comment 4 Terje Rosten 2025-11-08 16:21:12 UTC
For packaging of application written in rust, please read and follow: 
 https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Rust/

Comment 5 程安絮 2025-11-09 04:15:39 UTC
(In reply to Terje Rosten from comment #4)
> For packaging of application written in rust, please read and follow: 
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Rust/

Thank you for sharing the link to the Fedora Rust Packaging Guidelines. I will read through the documentation carefully to ensure I properly understand the requirements and best practices for packaging Rust applications. This is a valuable resource, and I appreciate you pointing me to it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.