Bug 2425714

Summary: Review Request: rubygem-minitest-global_expectations - Support minitest expectation methods for all objects
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://github.com/jeremyevans/minitest-global_expectations
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Mamoru TASAKA 2025-12-29 07:56:11 UTC 
Spec URL: https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/gem-related/rubygem-minitest-global_expectations.spec
SRPM URL: https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/gem-related/rubygem-minitest-global_expectations-1.0.2-1.fc44.src.rpm
Description: 
minitest-global_expectations allows you to keep using simple code in your
minitest specs, without having to wrap every single object you are calling
an expectation method on with an underscore.

Fedora Account System Username: mtasaka

Note:
With this Minitest 6 change:

https://github.com/minitest/minitest/blob/edd37ce7240a645054485b8c470927765e65351b/History.rdoc?plain=1#L30
minitest/spec expectations is removed from ruby's "generic" Object. This package
restores previous behavior, which is widely used in rubygem-rack and its series.
Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-12-29 07:59:12 UTC 
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9957348
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2425714-rubygem-minitest-global_expectations/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09957348-rubygem-minitest-global_expectations/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file MIT-LICENSE.html is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.