Bug 2428626

Summary: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-logo-menu - Quick access menu for the GNOME panel
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Carl George 🎩 <carl>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Neal Gompa <ngompa13>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: ngompa13, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: AutomationTriaged
Target Release: ---Flags: ngompa13: fedora-review+
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://github.com/Aryan20/Logomenu
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-03-16 22:36:47 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9999486 to 10179938 none

Description Carl George 🎩 2026-01-12 06:05:15 UTC
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09993377-gnome-shell-extension-logo-menu/gnome-shell-extension-logo-menu.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09993377-gnome-shell-extension-logo-menu/gnome-shell-extension-logo-menu-24.2-1.fc44.src.rpm

Description:
This extension gives a simple menu along with the ability to get the icon of
your distro on top left part of the panel for a great look.  The Icon can be
customised through settings, it has both Linux and BSD logos.

Fedora Account System Username: carlwgeorge

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-12 06:08:38 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9999486
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2428626-gnome-shell-extension-logo-menu/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09999486-gnome-shell-extension-logo-menu/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Neal Gompa 2026-01-13 23:09:10 UTC
Taking this review.

Comment 4 Neal Gompa 2026-02-14 01:13:13 UTC
Initial spec review:

> Requires:       gnome-shell >= 46

This should be using the new dependency generator stuff now by adding "BuildRequires: gnome-shell-rpm-generators", but I just tried it with https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-shell-extension-background-logo/pull-request/4 and it's not working.

At least for now, this should manually synthesize the Provides and Requires in the form the depgen does: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-shell-rpm-generators/blob/rawhide/f/gnome_shell.attr

> %{_datadir}/gnome-shell/extensions/%{uuid}

This should have a trailing slash so that it's always obvious this is a folder.

Comment 5 Carl George 🎩 2026-03-01 03:26:20 UTC
> This should be using the new dependency generator stuff

I intentionally only want to set a lower bound.  This allows for users to easily test the extension with a newer GNOME version by setting the dconf key /org/gnome/shell/disable-extension-version-validation to true.  And if they don't set that, they can still disable the extension without uninstalling it and proceed with system upgrades.  When a future update adds compatibility they can observe in the Extensions app that the warning icon goes away and they can enable it again.

Beyond just using the extension, this capability is highly beneficial for collaboration with upstream.  It makes it easy to report to upstream that the extension works on new versions of GNOME (so they just need to update metadata.json), or that it doesn't work with the corresponding error message.

Both of those aspects, combined with the quick six month cadence of new GNOME versions, makes the generator untenable to me.  Since it's not required by the guidelines, I'll pass on this.

> This should have a trailing slash

This is also not required by the guidelines, and is just a personal preference, so I'll pass on this one too.


Are there any review-blocking items?

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2026-03-01 04:37:37 UTC
Created attachment 2131429 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9999486 to 10179938

Comment 8 Fedora Review Service 2026-03-01 04:37:39 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10179938
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2428626-gnome-shell-extension-logo-menu/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10179938-gnome-shell-extension-logo-menu/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 9 Neal Gompa 2026-03-11 00:15:56 UTC
Meh, sure. I think you should do something to acknowledge it needs to be a directory, but a strict reading doesn't indicate one way or another.

Everything else about this is gravy now...

* Licensing is correct
* Package builds and installs
* No serious rpmlint issues

PACKAGE APPROVED.

Comment 10 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-03-16 22:19:58 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-shell-extension-logo-menu

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2026-03-16 22:34:22 UTC
FEDORA-2026-263f0efcd2 (gnome-shell-extension-logo-menu-24.4-1.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-263f0efcd2

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2026-03-16 22:36:47 UTC
FEDORA-2026-263f0efcd2 (gnome-shell-extension-logo-menu-24.4-1.fc45) has been pushed to the Fedora 45 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.