Bug 2430073

Summary: Review Request: fedora-jam-audio-config - A lightweight set of scripts to configure PipeWire in Fedora Jam
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Erich Eickmeyer <erich>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: ngompa13, package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://pagure.io/fedora-jam-audio-configuration
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Erich Eickmeyer 2026-01-15 17:42:48 UTC
Spec URL: https://pagure.io/fedora-jam-audio-configuration/raw/main/f/rpmspec/fedora-jam-audio-config.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/eeickmeyer/Jam-Incoming/fedora-43-x86_64/10010235-fedora-jam-audio-config/fedora-jam-audio-config-1.0-1.fc43.src.rpm
Description: 	
A lightweight set of GUI scripts for manipulating a user's
PipeWire-JACK configuration as well as a system's GRUB configuration
to optimize for low-latency audio performance on Fedora Jam.
Fork of Ubuntu Studio Audio Configuration.
Fedora Account System Username: eeickmeyer

Comment 1 Neal Gompa 2026-01-20 18:01:46 UTC
This should be using qarma or kdialog instead of zenity, FYI. At least switching from zenity to qarma should be trivial, as it's command-line compatible.

Comment 2 Erich Eickmeyer 2026-01-20 18:07:55 UTC
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #1)
> This should be using qarma or kdialog instead of zenity, FYI. At least
> switching from zenity to qarma should be trivial, as it's command-line
> compatible.

I mean, perhaps, but it's not meant to be *just* for JAM. For instance, one could easily install this in Workstation or something else. This could get into quibbling over the DE really quickly, so I'd rather not.

Comment 3 Erich Eickmeyer 2026-01-20 18:57:18 UTC
I did just test it with qarma and it's not a drop-in replacement and would take quite a bit of refactoring, so I'd rather stick with zenity for now. Nice thought though, I was considering making it execute zenity or qarma depending on the DE, and providing different binary packages to install zenity or qarma depending on which the user chose to install.

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-21 23:41:25 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10043134
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2430073-fedora-jam-audio-config/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10043134-fedora-jam-audio-config/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.