Bug 2430073 - Review Request: fedora-jam-audio-config - PipeWire-JACK audio configuration tool for Fedora Jam
Summary: Review Request: fedora-jam-audio-config - PipeWire-JACK audio configuration ...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://pagure.io/fedora-jam-audio-co...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-01-15 17:42 UTC by Erich Eickmeyer
Modified: 2026-02-23 23:54 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10043134 to 10055140 (3.75 KB, patch)
2026-01-25 00:43 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10055140 to 10162058 (3.68 KB, patch)
2026-02-23 23:54 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Erich Eickmeyer 2026-01-15 17:42:48 UTC
Spec URL: https://pagure.io/fedora-jam-audio-configuration/raw/main/f/rpmspec/fedora-jam-audio-config.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/eeickmeyer/Jam-Incoming/fedora-43-x86_64/10010235-fedora-jam-audio-config/fedora-jam-audio-config-1.0-1.fc43.src.rpm
Description: 	
A Python application providing a graphical interface for configuring
PipeWire-JACK settings and GRUB kernel parameters to optimize a system
for low-latency audio performance on Fedora Jam. The GUI supports both
GTK (via PyGObject) and Qt (via PyQt6) backends, and includes systemd
user services to apply audio configuration automatically at login.

Comment 1 Neal Gompa 2026-01-20 18:01:46 UTC
This should be using qarma or kdialog instead of zenity, FYI. At least switching from zenity to qarma should be trivial, as it's command-line compatible.

Comment 2 Erich Eickmeyer 2026-01-20 18:07:55 UTC
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #1)
> This should be using qarma or kdialog instead of zenity, FYI. At least
> switching from zenity to qarma should be trivial, as it's command-line
> compatible.

I mean, perhaps, but it's not meant to be *just* for JAM. For instance, one could easily install this in Workstation or something else. This could get into quibbling over the DE really quickly, so I'd rather not.

Comment 3 Erich Eickmeyer 2026-01-20 18:57:18 UTC
I did just test it with qarma and it's not a drop-in replacement and would take quite a bit of refactoring, so I'd rather stick with zenity for now. Nice thought though, I was considering making it execute zenity or qarma depending on the DE, and providing different binary packages to install zenity or qarma depending on which the user chose to install.

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-21 23:41:25 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10043134
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2430073-fedora-jam-audio-config/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10043134-fedora-jam-audio-config/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-25 00:43:46 UTC
Created attachment 2123663 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10043134 to 10055140

Comment 8 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-25 00:43:49 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10055140
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2430073-fedora-jam-audio-config/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10055140-fedora-jam-audio-config/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/fedora-jam-audio-config/diff.txt
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 10 Fedora Review Service 2026-02-23 23:54:53 UTC
Created attachment 2130759 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10055140 to 10162058

Comment 11 Fedora Review Service 2026-02-23 23:54:56 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10162058
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2430073-fedora-jam-audio-config/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10162058-fedora-jam-audio-config/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.