Bug 2430668

Summary: Review Request: obs-studio-plugin-pwvideo - OBS PipeWire video source
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Hoshino Lina <lina>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Neal Gompa <ngompa13>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: ngompa13, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: ngompa13: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://github.com/hoshinolina/obs-pwvideo
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-01-31 09:23:14 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Hoshino Lina 2026-01-18 08:44:02 UTC
Spec URL: https://cloud.hoshinolina.net/public.php/dav/files/PNJNK24BXzCGw8H
SRPM URL: https://cloud.hoshinolina.net/public.php/dav/files/RpAcaTi3qFjpYy4
Description:

Generic PipeWire video source for OBS.
Useful for routing arbitrary video streams into
your scenes.

Fedora Account System Username: hoshinolina

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-18 08:44:31 UTC
Cannot find any valid SRPM URL for this ticket. Common causes are:

- You didn't specify `SRPM URL: ...` in the ticket description
  or any of your comments
- The URL schema isn't HTTP or HTTPS
- The SRPM package linked in your URL doesn't match the package name specified
  in the ticket summary


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Neal Gompa 2026-01-18 10:42:40 UTC
Taking this review.

Comment 3 Neal Gompa 2026-01-18 10:54:25 UTC
It seems the bot can't figure out how to deal with your URLs. FYI, as a packager, you have access to your own fedorapeople.org space. And alternatively, you can also use COPR as well to "host" something that the bots can read.

Initial spec review

> Source0:        https://github.com/hoshinolina/obs-pwvideo/archive/%{version_no_tilde}/obs-pwvideo-%{version_no_tilde}.tar.gz

This can be simplified to "%{url}/archive/%{version_no_tilde}/obs-pwvideo-%{version_no_tilde}.tar.gz"

> %setup -q -n obs-pwvideo-%{version_no_tilde}

Please use "%autosetup" in place of "%setup -q". 

But also as a further optimization, you can use the relatively new "%autosetup -C" instead of "%autosetup -n obs-pwvideo-%{version_no_tilde}" as long as you don't intend to backport it to RHEL via EPEL.

(there's an open backport request for EPEL 10, but at the moment, it is not yet available)

> %build
> %cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo \
>        -GNinja
>
> %cmake_build

Please split this out into a %conf stage unless you intend to backport this to EPEL 9. Such a split looks like this:

%conf
%cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo \
       -GNinja

%build
%cmake_build

Comment 4 Hoshino Lina 2026-01-21 15:47:37 UTC
Updated spec and SRPM here! Sorry about the nextcloud thing, I was trying to access the wrong server and I was wondering why it didn't work, that's why I ended up using nextcloud...

Spec URL: https://hoshinolina.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio-plugin-pwvideo.spec
SRPM URL: https://hoshinolina.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio-plugin-pwvideo-0.1.0~rc2-1.fc43.src.rpm

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-21 15:53:49 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10042232
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2430668-obs-studio-plugin-pwvideo/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10042232-obs-studio-plugin-pwvideo/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Hoshino Lina 2026-01-21 16:04:39 UTC
Fixed the LICENSE thing that the review template pointed out in the upstream repo (I plan to tag & bump before actually pushing this to Fedora)

Comment 7 Neal Gompa 2026-01-21 16:27:29 UTC
Review notes:

* Package follows Fedora packaging guidelines
* Package builds and installs
* Licensing is correct and license data installed
* No serious issues from rpmlint

PACKAGE APPROVED.

Comment 8 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-01-27 09:00:49 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/obs-studio-plugin-pwvideo

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2026-01-31 09:18:50 UTC
FEDORA-2026-10375a4327 (obs-studio-plugin-pwvideo-0.1.0-1.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-10375a4327

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2026-01-31 09:23:14 UTC
FEDORA-2026-10375a4327 (obs-studio-plugin-pwvideo-0.1.0-1.fc44) has been pushed to the Fedora 44 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2026-01-31 10:06:12 UTC
FEDORA-2026-d463dd0320 (obs-studio-plugin-pwvideo-0.1.0-1.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-d463dd0320

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2026-01-31 10:06:28 UTC
FEDORA-2026-bf257e88da (obs-studio-plugin-pwvideo-0.1.0-1.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-bf257e88da

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2026-02-01 00:50:49 UTC
FEDORA-2026-d463dd0320 (obs-studio-plugin-pwvideo-0.1.0-1.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2026-02-01 01:03:05 UTC
FEDORA-2026-bf257e88da (obs-studio-plugin-pwvideo-0.1.0-1.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.