Bug 243532
Summary: | mpath volumes in /etc/fstab should use names instead of labels | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Bryn M. Reeves <bmr> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | David Cantrell <dcantrell> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | urgent | ||
Version: | 5.0 | CC: | bmarzins, i-kitayama, junichi.nomura, k.georgiou, kueda |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | RHBA-2007-0644 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-11-07 17:21:54 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 185852 |
Description
Bryn M. Reeves
2007-06-09 14:31:39 UTC
Not using label might be a solution. But there is another solution: modifying e2fsprogs and others to understand the stacked device. A patch for e2fsprogs is provided in this BZ (comment#19): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156324 I think this is probably a better way of doing it, but it's mount that needs to understand the stacked devices - in RHEL5 it's provided by util-linux. Seems this would increase the number of packages that need to be touched for this feature when we're already on a fairly tight schedule. Anaconda now writes /dev/mpath* names to /etc/fstab even if there is a filesystem label. Moving state to modified. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0644.html |