Bug 2443729
| Summary: | Review Request: nettle3.10 - Compatibility version of the Nettle library | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Daiki Ueno <dueno> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Alexander Sosedkin <asosedki> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | asosedki, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | asosedki:
fedora-review?
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://www.lysator.liu.se/~nisse/nettle/ | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | --- | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Daiki Ueno
2026-03-02 05:17:48 UTC
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10185506 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2443729-nettle3.10/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10185506-nettle3.10/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Deferring the full review until later when it starts building. Nothing caught my eye in a cursory review of the specfile, but in the meantime, here's a bike shed: why nettle3.10? why not nettle3, nettle3-compat or compat-nettle3? > why nettle3.10? why not nettle3, nettle3-compat or compat-nettle3? Although it was a long ago and we no longer ship it, but there were soname bumps in nettle 3.4 and 3.6, so I thought it might make sense to be explicit that this compat package only supports nettle 3.10 ABI. As for the compat prefix/suffix, I'm mostly following the convention of "openssl1.1" package introduced in bug 1879067, which was initially named "compat-openssl11". |