Spec URL: https://ueno.fedorapeople.org/nettle3.10/nettle3.10.spec SRPM URL: https://ueno.fedorapeople.org/nettle3.10/nettle3.10-3.10.1-1.fc45.src.rpm Description: Nettle is a cryptographic library that is designed to fit easily in more or less any context: In crypto toolkits for object-oriented languages (C++, Python, Pike, ...), in applications like LSH or GNUPG, or even in kernel space. This version of Nettle package contains only the libraries from the 3.10 version and is provided for compatibility with previous releases. Reproducible: Always
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10185506 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2443729-nettle3.10/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10185506-nettle3.10/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Deferring the full review until later when it starts building. Nothing caught my eye in a cursory review of the specfile, but in the meantime, here's a bike shed: why nettle3.10? why not nettle3, nettle3-compat or compat-nettle3?
> why nettle3.10? why not nettle3, nettle3-compat or compat-nettle3? Although it was a long ago and we no longer ship it, but there were soname bumps in nettle 3.4 and 3.6, so I thought it might make sense to be explicit that this compat package only supports nettle 3.10 ABI. As for the compat prefix/suffix, I'm mostly following the convention of "openssl1.1" package introduced in bug 1879067, which was initially named "compat-openssl11".