Bug 245463

Summary: please add %{arm} to pm-utils's list of build archs
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh>
Component: pm-utilsAssignee: Phil Knirsch <pknirsch>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: opensource, rvokal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-09-13 00:33:49 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 245418    

Description Lennert Buytenhek 2007-06-23 12:21:21 EDT
pm-utils is currently not built for arm, but there's not really any reason
why it shouldn't.

Would you please consider adding the string "%{arm}" (which is an rpm
macro that expands to the set of supported arm sub-archs) to pm-utils's
ExclusiveArch: line?

Thanks for your time.
Comment 1 Till Maas 2007-08-30 11:35:10 EDT
Imho it should be "%{?arm}", so it gets expanded to nothing when it is nod
defined. At least this is what happens here locally with rpm --eval.
Comment 2 Lennert Buytenhek 2007-08-31 02:28:23 EDT
Thanks for your reply.

The rawhide version of rpm does define %{arm}.  That said, if you use the
same spec file for rawhide and pre-rawhide, then %{?arm} would make more
sense, yes.  Note that rpm, gcc, binutils and such packages do use %{arm}
in their spec files.
Comment 3 Till Maas 2007-08-31 04:52:44 EDT
I have added %{?arm} to ExclusiveArch in cvs. Can you rebuild the package for
arm to test, whether it really builds? I guess you do not need radeontool or
vditool for arm, or do you? They are both only built for %{ix86} x86_64.
Comment 4 Till Maas 2007-09-13 00:33:49 EDT
radeontool and vbetool are now a separate packages and do not use ExclusiveArch.
pm-utils is now rebuild.