Bug 245463
Summary: | please add %{arm} to pm-utils's list of build archs | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh> |
Component: | pm-utils | Assignee: | Phil Knirsch <pknirsch> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | opensource, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-09-13 04:33:49 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 245418 |
Description
Lennert Buytenhek
2007-06-23 16:21:21 UTC
Imho it should be "%{?arm}", so it gets expanded to nothing when it is nod defined. At least this is what happens here locally with rpm --eval. Thanks for your reply. The rawhide version of rpm does define %{arm}. That said, if you use the same spec file for rawhide and pre-rawhide, then %{?arm} would make more sense, yes. Note that rpm, gcc, binutils and such packages do use %{arm} in their spec files. I have added %{?arm} to ExclusiveArch in cvs. Can you rebuild the package for arm to test, whether it really builds? I guess you do not need radeontool or vditool for arm, or do you? They are both only built for %{ix86} x86_64. radeontool and vbetool are now a separate packages and do not use ExclusiveArch. pm-utils is now rebuild. |