pm-utils is currently not built for arm, but there's not really any reason why it shouldn't. Would you please consider adding the string "%{arm}" (which is an rpm macro that expands to the set of supported arm sub-archs) to pm-utils's ExclusiveArch: line? Thanks for your time.
Imho it should be "%{?arm}", so it gets expanded to nothing when it is nod defined. At least this is what happens here locally with rpm --eval.
Thanks for your reply. The rawhide version of rpm does define %{arm}. That said, if you use the same spec file for rawhide and pre-rawhide, then %{?arm} would make more sense, yes. Note that rpm, gcc, binutils and such packages do use %{arm} in their spec files.
I have added %{?arm} to ExclusiveArch in cvs. Can you rebuild the package for arm to test, whether it really builds? I guess you do not need radeontool or vditool for arm, or do you? They are both only built for %{ix86} x86_64.
radeontool and vbetool are now a separate packages and do not use ExclusiveArch. pm-utils is now rebuild.