Bug 2457639
| Summary: | The background logo is too transparent and hard to see on F44 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Daniel Rusek <drusek> | ||||||
| Component: | gnome-shell-extension-background-logo | Assignee: | Florian Müllner <fmuellner> | ||||||
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
| Version: | 44 | CC: | awilliam, fmuellner, gnome-sig, kalevlember, mail, mcatanza, robatino, zejdzztegomaila | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Regression | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | AcceptedFreezeException RejectedBlocker | ||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | --- | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 2362360 | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Daniel Rusek
2026-04-12 10:54:20 UTC
Created attachment 2136819 [details]
Fedora 44 desktop
Proposed as a Blocker and Freeze Exception for 44-final by Fedora user asciiwolf using the blocker tracking app because: The Fedora background logo (that is an important part of the Fedora branding) is too transparent and hard to see on Fedora 44 with the default wallpaper. My solution is to use the white version of the logo instead. Created attachment 2136922 [details]
Quick design I threw together with the white logo
+7 FE in https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/2103 , marking accepted. Will leave blocker decision for the meeting. AGREED RejectedFinalBlocker Discussed at the 2026-04-13 (blocker / freeze exception) review meeting: We agreed this isn't serious enough to constitute a violation of the artwork criteria. The watermark is present and visible, just a bit subtle; it's also not really an issue on the dark mode wallpaper. https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org//blocker-review_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2026-04-13/f44-blocker-review.2026-04-13-16.00.log.txt |