Bug 246820
Summary: | SELinux error while installing | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nadav Kavalerchik <nadavkav> |
Component: | allegro | Assignee: | Jindrich Novy <jnovy> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 7 | CC: | hdegoede, pknirsch |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-07-06 10:03:32 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Nadav Kavalerchik
2007-07-05 08:16:40 UTC
The unlabeled file error means that for some reason the original wasn't labeled maybe because you're using apt-get (which is not supported), more likely because you have selinux disabled. Notice that this error message is harmless in case you've selinux disabled. jnovy, I do think that since it is harmless we should hide it by adding 2> /dev/null to the chcon command in the %post script, agreed? originally, i've installed it with yum. so i guess it should have been labeled. btw. i thought that the running rpm underling yum or apt-get does the work no matter what i use to update the system with. i know it's now a big issue, but i thought you guys might want to smooth it out. (In reply to comment #2) > originally, i've installed it with yum. so i guess it should have been labeled. > > btw. i thought that the running rpm underling yum or apt-get does the work no > matter what i use to update the system with. > It does, which is why I wrote "maybe because you're using apt-get", with emphasizes on the maybe. > i know it's now a big issue, but i thought you guys might want to smooth it out. > We do, thanks for reporting, but first we need to know why this happens, are you running with selinux disabled? yes, selinux is disabled. and btw. i used apt-get because yum had many packedges that it couldn't upgrade so i used apt-get to move from fc6 to fc7 (first, i tried upgrading from fc7 dvd, but... anaconda crashed, which is a different bug :-( Thanks, that explains the error. The next rawhide push should contain 4.2.1-3, which has the error output in this scenario silenced (the error was already ignored). (In reply to comment #5) > The next rawhide push should contain 4.2.1-3, which has the error output in this > scenario silenced (the error was already ignored). > Scrap that, allegro doesn't build on rawhide at the moment, see bug 247256 |