Bug 247061

Summary:	Initscript Review (spamassassin)
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Harald Hoyer <harald>
Component:	spamassassin	Assignee:	Warren Togami <wtogami>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	paul, triage
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	bzcl34nup
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-12-16 00:38:18 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	246824, 247062

Description Harald Hoyer 2007-07-05 13:59:24 UTC

Please have a look at the wikipage 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FCNewInit/Initscripts
and change your initscripts to comply with the LSB standard.
Especially check the exit status and add a LSB Header.
E.g. starting a service should return with 0, if the service is already running and stopping a stopped service should also return with 0.

Also check, if your service has to be _on_ per default, and turn it off in the old chkconfig line, if not.

Thank you.

Comment 1 Paul Howarth 2007-08-03 12:24:41 UTC

What is the facility name for spamd going to be in the LSB-compliant initscript?

spamd, spamassassin, something else?

I need to know so that I can add that facility name as a
Required-Start/Required-Stop for spamass-milter (Big #247062).

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-04-04 13:16:20 UTC

Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported
during the development of Fedora 8. In order to refocus our efforts as
a project we are changing the version of this bug to '8'.

If this bug still exists in rawhide, please change the version back to
rawhide.
(If you're unable to change the bug's version, add a comment to the bug
and someone will change it for you.)

Thanks for your help and we apologize for the interruption.

The process we're following is outlined here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp

We will be following the process here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this
doesn't happen again.

Comment 3 Paul Howarth 2008-04-04 13:39:54 UTC

LSB-ization of initscripts is targeted at future releases rather than
current/previous releases.

Comment 4 Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-16 00:38:18 UTC

According to the guidelines: 
"LSB Headers are not required for Fedora SysV-style initscripts, but they may be used."

I think this needs to be pushed upstream, not here. 

I'm going to go ahead and close this bug now. 
Feel free to reopen if you think otherwise.