|Summary:||Initscript Review (spamass-milter)|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Harald Hoyer <harald>|
|Component:||spamass-milter||Assignee:||Paul Howarth <paul>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Fixed In Version:||0.3.1-5.fc8||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2008-12-17 09:40:15 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:||247061|
Description Harald Hoyer 2007-07-05 13:59:27 UTC
Please have a look at the wikipage http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FCNewInit/Initscripts and change your initscripts to comply with the LSB standard. Especially check the exit status and add a LSB Header. E.g. starting a service should return with 0, if the service is already running and stopping a stopped service should also return with 0. Also check, if your service has to be _on_ per default, and turn it off in the old chkconfig line, if not. Thank you.
Comment 1 Paul Howarth 2007-10-16 17:43:28 UTC
spamass-milter-0.3.1-5.fc8 should be LSB-compliant. I'll leave this ticket open though because the initscript expects spamassassin to be running and hence has: # Should-Start: spamd spamassassin # Should-Stop: spamd spamassassin I've used both "spamd" and "spamassassin" because spamassassin itself does not yet have an LSB-compliant initscript and hence I don't know the feature name that it will eventually provide is. The two names I've used seem reasonable guesses and I'll remove whichever one is eventually not necessary at a later date.
Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-04-04 13:16:31 UTC
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported during the development of Fedora 8. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are changing the version of this bug to '8'. If this bug still exists in rawhide, please change the version back to rawhide. (If you're unable to change the bug's version, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help and we apologize for the interruption. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.
Comment 3 Paul Howarth 2008-04-04 13:44:14 UTC
Still waiting on dependent spamassassin initscript update (Bug 247061)