Bug 250469

Summary: Review Request: olpc-security - A metapackage for the OLPC security platform
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Noah Kantrowitz <noah>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, michael, notting, opensource
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-25 22:14:19 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Noah Kantrowitz 2007-08-01 19:29:19 UTC 
Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/olpc-security/olpc-security.spec
SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/olpc-security/olpc-security-0.1-0.0.20070724.src.rpm
Description: This is a metapackage to pull in the rest of the OLPC security platform. This exists to allow our developers to test the security system before we merge it into our builds and force it on. Even after that there is some value is letting people explore the system on a standard desktop (if they are using the jhbuild development environment). I know metapackages are generally discouraged, however groups are not an option given how the OLPC image build system is setup.
Comment 1 Noah Kantrowitz 2007-08-02 21:40:43 UTC 
Version bump for dependency name change

Spec is in the same place.
SPRM: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/olpc-security/olpc-security-0.1-0.1.20070724.src.rpm
Comment 2 Till Maas 2007-09-06 12:34:43 UTC 
You should use %{_sysconfdir} instead of hardcoded etc.
Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2008-06-25 22:14:19 UTC 
I was informed that this old ticket is no longer relevant; closing.