Bug 250766
Summary: | kernel panic in 32-bit domU when running on x86_64 dom0 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Paul Batkowski <pbatkowski> | ||||
Component: | kernel-xen | Assignee: | Xen Maintainance List <xen-maint> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Martin Jenner <mjenner> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 5.1 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | RHBA-2008-0314 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-05-21 14:48:26 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | 318891 | ||||||
Bug Blocks: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Paul Batkowski
2007-08-03 14:46:49 UTC
Created attachment 160615 [details]
stack trace from the domU kernel panic.
Paul, 32-on-64 support is much improved with 5.2. Can you give it a whirl and let us know if it works better? Save/restore/live migrate is still known to fail for 32-on-64, but most other things should work. Thanks, Chris Lalancette Hi Chris, Running my 32-bit domU on a 64-bit dom0 with kernel 2.6.18-79.el5xen if fine. I'm a happy camper. Thanks, Paul This was fixed by the rebase of the Xen Hypervisor to 3,1.2 (bz 318891). Setting flags to process for RHEL 5.2. verifying, I've been running a 32-bit domU on a 64-bit dom0 for a couple of months now without issues. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0314.html |