Bug 250845

Summary:	Please rebuild arj for EPEL 4 and 5
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	arj	Assignee:	Robert Scheck <redhat>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	hdegoede, steve
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	kevin: fedora-cvs+
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-08-13 21:53:24 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	249079

Description Robert Scheck 2007-08-03 21:18:22 UTC

Description of problem:
Please rebuild arj for EPEL 4 and 5

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
arj-3.10.22-1

Actual results:
No arj in EPEL 4 and 5

Expected results:
Package arj in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's an amavisd-new dependency.

Additional info:
Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package 
there.

Mockbuild in EPEL 5 succeded for me and looks fine, too:
Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/arj-3.10.22-1.el5.i386.rpm
Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/arj-debuginfo-3.10.22-1.el5.i386.rpm

Comment 1 Hans de Goede 2007-08-03 21:23:58 UTC

I don't have any EPEL machines / installs and thus do not feel capable of
maintaining packages in EPEL (atleast not by myself). Here is my usual solution
to this:

You own arj in EPEL, with me as co-maintainer and you become a co-maintainer in
Fedora. That way we will always both know whats going on on the other side of
the "fence" and see each others bug reports. I will be more then willing to help
with any EPEL issues as the arise, but I do not feel comfortable maintaining it
myself.

If you agree, please create a CVS admin request in bugzilla requesting the
necessary changes.

Comment 2 Steven Pritchard 2007-08-03 21:28:55 UTC

I don't mind co-maintaining the EPEL branches, since it is a dependency of my
package (amavisd-new).

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2007-08-07 19:42:30 UTC

I also could co-maintain the package. Steven: You or me?

Comment 4 Steven Pritchard 2007-08-08 20:31:19 UTC

(In reply to comment #3)
> I also could co-maintain the package. Steven: You or me?

How about we say "all of the above" and really give the co-maintainer thing a try?

Comment 5 Robert Scheck 2007-08-11 17:07:27 UTC

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: arj
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
Updated Fedora Owners: j.w.r.degoede,robert
Updated EPEL Owners: robert,j.w.r.degoede

Comment 6 Kevin Fenzi 2007-08-11 21:55:53 UTC

cvs done. 

In reply to comment #4: Did you wish to be listed as a co-maintainer as well
Steven? If so, add another request and reset the flag.

Comment 7 Hans de Goede 2007-08-12 20:09:12 UTC

Robert, you're now the proud owner of this bug, close it when arj is build for
EPEL-4 and 5

Comment 8 Robert Scheck 2007-08-12 20:11:00 UTC

I'm already working on this, but the buildsys.fedoraproject.org builders 
currently have a problem; already contacted Mike McGrath...

Comment 9 Hans de Goede 2007-08-12 20:12:13 UTC

No problem, I just wanted to get this of my list of open bugs, hence the reassign.

Comment 10 Robert Scheck 2007-08-13 21:53:24 UTC

Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded.
Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded.