Bug 257761
| Summary: | Review Request: g2lib - GRIB2 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Patrice Dumas <pertusus> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Michel Lind <michel> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-03-02 14:00:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 373861 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 257781 | ||
|
Description
Patrice Dumas
2007-08-27 19:38:05 UTC
Any test programs I could use to verify that the package is working? - I'm hesitant about the placement of the module files -- perhaps
%{_libdir}/g2lib would be a better place?
- I'm not a Fortran expert, but this seems to suggest that .mod files are
susceptible to ABI breaks. In that case you'd have to Requires: the appropriate
version of gcc-gfortran. Any idea?
- 1.10 is out
The mod files placement has been discussed on the packaging list and the draft was accepted: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FortranModulesDir Still blocked by the needed changes in fedora rpm macros. Use fmoddir and update to latest: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/g2lib-1.1.6-1.fc10.src.rpm One thing worth noting is that I change the library name for something more specific and less prone to clashes. (In reply to comment #1) > Any test programs I could use to verify that the package is working? There is cnvgrib that I submitted here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257781 Ping. I've not been noticing this bug because its blocker has not changed status -- is the matter resolved? It has been resolved since a long time on F10, but I reopened it for F9. Nobody seems to care, and Jakub disagrees on the placement of the fortran modules anyway, so I closed the bug. The real issue for that submission is that I have left Fedora... Nobody have shown interest in that submission, so maybe the best is to close it. Sorry to hear that. Hope you'll be back, though. |