Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Description of problem: According to Tibbs, the proposal http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FortranModulesDir has been accepted. So I ask to add in the macros file %_fmoddir %{_libdir}/gfortran/modules and modify FFLAGS to read FFLAGS="${FFLAGS:-%optflags -I%_fmoddir}" ; export FFLAGS ; \ My test shows that the -I%_fmoddir should also be in redhat/macros I leave to you what should be in upstream macros file and in redhat/macros Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
This is distro packaging policy really, belongs to redhat-rpm-config.
Could this be worked on? Some multilib fixes would easily be fixed once this is done. I can provide patches, though they are quite trivial.
Last comment is 2 month old. This change is trivial, corresponds with a packaging policy, blocks proper packaging of packages that are shipping mod files. Could this be acted upon? I don't think it makes sense to start the MIA procedure, I guess that people are still here.
This was filed under a different user account so I didn't see the bug. I have taken steps to correct this and will look into this.
Could it be possible to push that change to F-9 too?
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Closing, since nobody seems to care, F9 is certainly too old to care about. Moreover Jakub disagrees on fmoddir.