Bug 275851
| Summary: | Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alexander Kahl <fedora> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, mtasaka, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-09-17 09:34:19 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 275831 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Alexander Kahl
2007-09-04 09:21:31 UTC
Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/pyzzub.spec Updated SRPM Url: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/pyzzub-0.8-2.fc7.src.rpm Building on x86_64 fixed. (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) For 0.8-2: - First of all, please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python for general information of spec file for python modules. You can try - install rpmdevtools - try "$ rpmdev-newspec -t python foo" to get skeleton spec file for python modules. Then: * Please write full source URL * Does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=158842 python-devel is missing from BuildRequires (python skeleton spec file contains this) * "Requires: python >= 2.5" is automatically checked by rpmbuild dependency check and is not needed * We recommend "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" * And fix up %files entry. By the way - This package does not contain any license text and some source files have no license term. Would you ask upstream about license clarification? As libzzub is in Bodhi for testing now, I'm going to take care of all the issues mentioned. I've generated the pyzzub bindings from libzzub as described in http://doc.zeitherrschaft.org/zzub/html/x113.html Thus, in my understanding pyzzub inherits libzzub's license as it is co-packaged and all files without license texts have been generated. The file library.py provided is GPLv2+. Please tell me if you still think we need clarification from upstream. (In reply to comment #5) > I've generated the pyzzub bindings from libzzub as described in > http://doc.zeitherrschaft.org/zzub/html/x113.html Ah, now I understand the situation. So, pyzzub is in the libzzub tarball. In this case, pyzzub must be created as a subpackage of libzzub. As far as I googled pyzzub, About versioning: Other distribution marks the version of pyzzub as the same one of libzzub. So now I mark this bug a duplicate of libzzub. Please rewrite libzzub spec file and create pyzzub rpm as a subpackage of libzzub. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 275831 *** |