Hide Forgot
Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/pyzzub.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/pyzzub-0.8-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: These are the Python bindings For libzzub, allowing you to use it from within Python scripts. -- I'm still searching for a sponsor. This package is needed to make libzzub work with aldrin.
Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/pyzzub.spec Updated SRPM Url: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/pyzzub-0.8-2.fc7.src.rpm Building on x86_64 fixed.
(Removing NEEDSPONSOR)
For 0.8-2: - First of all, please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python for general information of spec file for python modules. You can try - install rpmdevtools - try "$ rpmdev-newspec -t python foo" to get skeleton spec file for python modules. Then: * Please write full source URL * Does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=158842 python-devel is missing from BuildRequires (python skeleton spec file contains this) * "Requires: python >= 2.5" is automatically checked by rpmbuild dependency check and is not needed * We recommend "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" * And fix up %files entry.
By the way - This package does not contain any license text and some source files have no license term. Would you ask upstream about license clarification?
As libzzub is in Bodhi for testing now, I'm going to take care of all the issues mentioned. I've generated the pyzzub bindings from libzzub as described in http://doc.zeitherrschaft.org/zzub/html/x113.html Thus, in my understanding pyzzub inherits libzzub's license as it is co-packaged and all files without license texts have been generated. The file library.py provided is GPLv2+. Please tell me if you still think we need clarification from upstream.
(In reply to comment #5) > I've generated the pyzzub bindings from libzzub as described in > http://doc.zeitherrschaft.org/zzub/html/x113.html Ah, now I understand the situation. So, pyzzub is in the libzzub tarball. In this case, pyzzub must be created as a subpackage of libzzub. As far as I googled pyzzub, About versioning: Other distribution marks the version of pyzzub as the same one of libzzub. So now I mark this bug a duplicate of libzzub. Please rewrite libzzub spec file and create pyzzub rpm as a subpackage of libzzub. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 275831 ***