Bug 275851 - Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub
Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 275831
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On: 275831
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-09-04 09:21 UTC by Alexander Kahl
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:12 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-09-17 09:34:19 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Alexander Kahl 2007-09-04 09:21:31 UTC
Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/pyzzub.spec
SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/pyzzub-0.8-1.fc7.src.rpm
Description: These are the Python bindings For libzzub, allowing you to use it from within Python scripts.


I'm still searching for a sponsor.

This package is needed to make libzzub work with aldrin.

Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-09-14 10:26:18 UTC

Comment 3 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-09-14 15:21:33 UTC
For 0.8-2:

- First of all, please check:
  for general information of spec file for python modules.

  You can try
  - install rpmdevtools
  - try "$ rpmdev-newspec -t python foo"
    to get skeleton spec file for python modules.

* Please write full source URL
* Does not build.
  python-devel is missing from BuildRequires
  (python skeleton spec file contains this)
* "Requires: python >= 2.5" is automatically checked by rpmbuild
   dependency check and is not needed
* We recommend "%defattr(-,root,root,-)"
* And fix up %files entry.

Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-09-14 15:30:34 UTC
By the way
- This package does not contain any license text and
  some source files have no license term.

  Would you ask upstream about license clarification?

Comment 5 Alexander Kahl 2007-09-17 09:10:41 UTC
As libzzub is in Bodhi for testing now, I'm going to take care of all the issues
mentioned. I've generated the pyzzub bindings from libzzub as described in

Thus, in my understanding pyzzub inherits libzzub's license as it is co-packaged
and all files without license texts have been generated.
The file library.py provided is GPLv2+.

Please tell me if you still think we need clarification from upstream.

Comment 6 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-09-17 09:34:19 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)

> I've generated the pyzzub bindings from libzzub as described in
> http://doc.zeitherrschaft.org/zzub/html/x113.html

Ah, now I understand the situation. So, pyzzub is in the libzzub
In this case, pyzzub must be created as a subpackage of libzzub.
As far as I googled pyzzub, About versioning: Other distribution 
marks the version of pyzzub as the same one of libzzub.

So now I mark this bug a duplicate of libzzub. Please rewrite
libzzub spec file and create pyzzub rpm as a subpackage of

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 275831 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.