Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/pyzzub.spec
SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/pyzzub-0.8-1.fc7.src.rpm
Description: These are the Python bindings For libzzub, allowing you to use it from within Python scripts.
I'm still searching for a sponsor.
This package is needed to make libzzub work with aldrin.
Updated Spec URL:
Updated SRPM Url:
Building on x86_64 fixed.
- First of all, please check:
for general information of spec file for python modules.
You can try
- install rpmdevtools
- try "$ rpmdev-newspec -t python foo"
to get skeleton spec file for python modules.
* Please write full source URL
* Does not build.
python-devel is missing from BuildRequires
(python skeleton spec file contains this)
* "Requires: python >= 2.5" is automatically checked by rpmbuild
dependency check and is not needed
* We recommend "%defattr(-,root,root,-)"
* And fix up %files entry.
By the way
- This package does not contain any license text and
some source files have no license term.
Would you ask upstream about license clarification?
As libzzub is in Bodhi for testing now, I'm going to take care of all the issues
mentioned. I've generated the pyzzub bindings from libzzub as described in
Thus, in my understanding pyzzub inherits libzzub's license as it is co-packaged
and all files without license texts have been generated.
The file library.py provided is GPLv2+.
Please tell me if you still think we need clarification from upstream.
(In reply to comment #5)
> I've generated the pyzzub bindings from libzzub as described in
Ah, now I understand the situation. So, pyzzub is in the libzzub
In this case, pyzzub must be created as a subpackage of libzzub.
As far as I googled pyzzub, About versioning: Other distribution
marks the version of pyzzub as the same one of libzzub.
So now I mark this bug a duplicate of libzzub. Please rewrite
libzzub spec file and create pyzzub rpm as a subpackage of
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 275831 ***